Even the biggest and most mighty brands can utterly bomb. It was either they miscalculated the situation, wrong execution of a campaign, or just totally out of touch with their consumers; the work of some marketing campaigns went terribly wrong, hurting the very companies trying to connect with their target audience. In this case study, we're going to look at three of the worst marketing fails by big brands-NETFLIX, SNAPCHAT, and MCDONALDS-and what happened, the fallout, and what was learned.
1. Snapchat’s Domestic Violence Blunder: Rihanna Ad (2018)
In 2018, Snapchat sold an ad for the mobile game Would You Rather? which read, "Would you rather slap Rihanna or punch Chris Brown? " This advertisement alludes to the notorious domestic violence incident involving these celebrities in 2009, during which Rihanna was the victim of an assault perpetrated by Brown.
It was literally laughing away the serious issue of domestic violence, which caused outrage from the commercial. People labelled Snapchat insensitive and careless to have committed such an action.
The fire reached its peak when the heiress responded. Rihanna posted a scathing rebuke against Snapchat on her Instagram account, damning that platform for trivializing the seriousness of domestic violence.
Fallout
The side effects of the reaction from Rihanna came immediately and very severe in impact. While its stocks plummeted 4%, thus making $800 million of the market capitalization go down the toilet, the debacle also dented the brand image pretty thoroughly. Hatred, coupled with personal viewpoints, dominates the discourse on social media, underscoring the company's recklessness.
Lesson learned
This tragedy shows that marketing should be sensitive. Brands must realize how the advert will be perceived by society and all cultures so as not to make whatever is posted very trivializing or any mockery of serious issues. Such a thing happened with Snapchat where no excellent review process was executed; thus, it hampered and hurt its corporate image.
2. Netflix's Qwikster Division Debacle (2011)
In 2011, Netflix finally decided to go for complete separation between its streaming and DVD rental services. The streaming service was going to be called Netflix again, and the DVD rental service was going to be called "Qwikster." The decision was made without presenting the idea to a select group of customers and thereby receiving their feedback on such a decision. The company received an instant response, and it was highly negative.
Subscribers were bewildered and annoyed at this split overnight. Many felt frustrated that they would now have to manage two different accounts and websites, which would make the customer's experience much more difficult to handle. In addition, the brand name Qwikster was a joke, and it was discovered that the corresponding Twitter handle had already been taken up by a much less professional citizen of the internet.
The Fallout
The public outcry made Netflix reconsider just a couple of weeks later, but the damage had already been done. The company lost close to 800,000 subscribers in the Qwikster debacle, and Netflix's stock fell nearly 40%.
Lessons Learned
The Qwikster flop by Netflix is one case where poor customer listening will not help the brand if drastic changes are made. Here again, a massive backlash was seen because experience with the user was not taken into consideration and because the company underplayed the importance of brand perception. This instance proves that proper communication and customer feedback must be sought before carrying out major changes to a product or service.
3. McDonald's Szechuan Sauce Fiasco (2017)
In 2017, with Rick and Morty in particular having a referenced this sauce in an episode, the company brought out McDonald's Szechuan sauce, which was initially released years ago as a limited edition. What was expected to be a lighthearted form of nostalgia became instead a failure on an epic scale. The chain miscalculated the demand for the sauce by orders of magnitude, releasing only a very small quantity of the sauce, at just a few restaurants.
Thousands of fans converged on McDonald's outlets in the country only to find out that the sauce had sold out within minutes. This called for chaos in the form of protest by angry customers, and there were several police interventions during this period as well.
The Fallout
The running out of the sauce was a total PR disaster for McDonald's as the company had been accused of misleading its consumers and not preparing well to roll out the product. The fans were very disappointed, with their disgruntlement housed on social media, where many aired their grievances. More sauce than allocated in the previous fiasco was released by McDonald's but little doubt remains that an unpleasant impression had already been placed on many consumers' minds.
Lesson Learned
Such a campaign only emphasizes how effective proper planning and logistics can be in marketing. Promotions may generate big demand, but if the supply chain is not ready to cater to that demand, it is likely to turn into a disaster overnight. McDonald's was painfully taught the lesson that consumer promotions must be undertaken with careful attention to logistics and preparation.
Key Takeaways: What Marketers Can Learn from These Failures
All three of the campaigns have in common; BAD judgment or a ridiculously bad execution for an established brand can create a public relations nightmare. Here are the top lessons from marketers who need to learn:
Sensitivity Counts: Be aware of the issues going on around you and know not to make your marketing a dramatization or exploitation of them.
Customer Feed-back is Essential: Don't do something big without first consulting your audience.
Logistics and Planning: Before running any promotion, ensure that the supply can match up with the demand. Proper planning prevents disappointment for consumers.
Preventing Marketing Disasters: Best Practices for Brands
If brands want to avoid the very situations where Snapchat or Netflix or McDonald's face then, they need to know the best marketing campaign planning practices. Here are a few of the most basic ones:
Pass Tight Review: All ads or promotions should be screened by different review levels to ensure that nothing unacceptable gets out.
Consumer Insights: It's the right time for well-informed decisions because you gather customer feedback and go well into research before change.
High Demand Preparation: If you are running a promotion with only limited-edition offering, your logistics team needs to be prepared for the increased demand.
Conclusion: High Stakes in Modern Marketing
Marketing campaigns are now more public and under scrutinised than ever before. Social media in an age of instant connectivity can make just one misstep balloon into a viral PR disaster. The marketing fails, as seen through case studies for Snapchat, Netflix, and McDonald's, remind us to take notice of even the smallest details-from content sensitivity to logistics. Learning from their mistakes will help brands better navigate the risks and rewards of modern marketing.
Opmerkingen