top of page

Ditch the "Demos Given" Metric: How to Actually Measure Pre-Sales Success

  • Writer: ClickInsights
    ClickInsights
  • 3 minutes ago
  • 5 min read

Introduction

Many enterprise SaaS companies continue to use one of the worst possible KPIs for measuring the productivity of their Sales Engineers' demos given.

On the surface, the KPI seems sensible. More demos equal better pipeline coverage and more customer engagement. Therefore, most pre-sales managers measure demo volume as one of the main KPIs for assessing SE performance. The problem is, this KPI does nothing to measure impact.

A Sales Engineer can give out a dozen demos to unqualified deals with zero impact on revenue growth. At the same time, another SE can cover fewer accounts and significantly impact technical evaluation and deal closures.

Why? Because the top pre-sales teams don't waste their time counting demos anymore, they focus on metrics that have a direct connection to business success. Pre-sales isn't about demos; it's about revenue.

Enterprise pre-sales team measuring revenue impact and technical win rates instead of demo volume

Why “Number of Demos” Is a Misleading KPI

Perhaps the greatest weakness of activity-based metrics is their focus on effort rather than effectiveness.

By placing such emphasis on demo volume, an organization ends up incentivizing reactiveness. Under these circumstances, Sales Engineers feel forced to participate in every single prospecting activity, regardless of its qualification or strategic relevance.

This results in a "busy calendar," where SEs are busy hopping from one unrelated demo to another without being able to add strategic value to any of them.

The problem is that such a metric also promotes superficial participation. In case the productivity of the SEs is measured in terms of the number of demos performed, then there will be no reason to put any extra effort into making such a demo meaningful.

Finally, such a metric disregards the pre-sales team's impact on the deal. An efficient SE can contribute greatly to the competitive positioning of a deal, finding potential blockers, increasing stakeholder alignment, and boosting customer confidence. None of this will show up in a standard activity metric.


Metrics That Actually Reflect SE Performance

Effective pre-sales KPIs are concerned with influence, not presence. A highly valuable indicator is the conversion rate from demo to close. It shows how many opportunities are closed out of those influenced by pre-sales before closing. The metric differs from demo count in that it reflects effectiveness.


Another key indicator is the technical win rate, which shows how often a company wins deals after entering the technical assessment phase. It allows isolating the effect of demos, technical validation, and building confidence with stakeholders.


Measuring stakeholder engagement quality is important, too. Enterprise deals are won or lost depending on how aligned executives, technical evaluators, and operations teams are. Research from Gartner shows that modern B2B buying decisions involve multiple stakeholders across the organization, making engagement quality far more important than simple demo volume.


Many Sales Engineers play an essential role in the further development of their accounts by identifying potential use cases and building confidence for the long term. The impact of pre-sales on expanding the opportunity can provide a more accurate view of business outcomes. This set of indicators correlates pre-sales performance with financial results rather than scheduled activities.


The Importance of AE-SE Pairing Success

Individual pre-sale success stories aren't the norm. In enterprise SaaS sales situations, the dynamic between the account executive and the sales engineer will dictate the experience buyers have. Yet, many organizations are still measuring success on an individual basis without looking at how well they partner together.

A well-functioning relationship between the AE and SE results in a more effective discovery process, more aligned demos, more consistent management and better competitive positioning. Poorly-functioning relationships lead to inconsistent messaging, disjointed processes and other issues for buyers.

It's precisely for these reasons that forward-thinking companies focus on AE-SE pairing success rather than just measuring individuals' success.

There are some AE-SE teams that naturally perform better than others due to chemistry, strategy and other factors. Tracking success across multiple relationships allows organizations to understand what successful collaboration entails.


Measuring Strategic Influence Beyond the Demo

Another key limitation with traditional pre-sales measurements is that they fail to quantify strategic contributions that happen outside of the customer demo experience.

Sales Engineers are often some of the best sources of market intelligence in the company. They deal with objections repeatedly within an industry context, discover workflow inefficiencies right from buyers, witness competition weaknesses first-hand, and discover future customer needs before other departments do.

This type of insight is highly valuable for Product, Marketing, and management teams. It makes sense then for pre-sales teams with high impact to measure feedback contribution as part of SE contribution. Do Sales Engineers help shape product roadmaps? Are they driving prioritization through friction insights from customers?

Competitive intelligence contributions also matter. In most cases, Sales Engineers actually know more about why deals were won or lost compared to CRM dashboards. Leveraging this kind of intelligence is critical for positioning.

Cross-departmental impact should not be overlooked. The best of the Solutions Masters typically influence sales readiness and improve collaboration and message alignment between departments. None of these impacts show up in demo counts, but they definitely impact revenue and customer retention.


Building a Healthier Pre-Sales Measurement Culture

Revising pre-sales metrics starts with revising leadership thinking. Most companies rely on activity-based metrics since they are easier to measure. The number of demonstrations done, the number of meetings attended, number of opportunities helped with all of these form a nice reporting structure.

However, being easy is not always being accurate. Healthy pre-sales measurement frameworks focus on influence, customer impact, and strategic value rather than mere activity numbers.

This demands leadership change. Rather than asking, “How many demos did the SE team deliver this quarter?” healthy companies will be asking questions like:

  • How did pre-sales impact the most important business?

  • Where did our technical positioning contribute to the deal closing?

  • Which sales and engineering pairings were the most successful?

  • Customer insight that influenced product strategy?

Such questions lead to healthier organizational habits. They also enable the strategic activities of Sales Engineers.

If SEs are measured based on the number of demos, they can get stuck in reactive loops. But when measured on influence and results, they have an opportunity to perform strategic discovery, proper preparation, customization, and customer engagement. These differences pay off in terms of both financial results and turnover.


Conclusion

The number of "demos given" metric is easy to follow. Still, it does not accurately represent the true value of the pre-sales team.

The Enterprise Sales Engineer is not only responsible for making presentations. They have an essential role in conducting technical assessments, building up stakeholder trust, positioning the company competitively, providing valuable market insights, and impacting revenue generation at all stages of the sales process.

It cannot be accurately represented simply based on volume.

The most successful pre-sales teams well understand this fact. That is why they focus on metrics like demo to close rate, technical wins, stakeholder engagement quality, expansion impact, and effectiveness of the SE-AE relationship because these measures truly show their business value.

Equally important is the fact that these metrics promote healthy behavior. They foster preparation versus activity and the notion that pre-sales drives revenue rather than merely making presentations.

In today's world of enterprise SaaS, those who measure their Solutions Masters by impact over activity will have more success in the long run.


Comments


bottom of page